Di Petik dari :blog : Tun Mahathir
By Dr. Mahathir Mohamad on November 2, 2010 3:40 PM
1. When the 5th PM took over, it became obvious he was incompetent and unable to govern the country and grow its economy. He was seen as weak by the Malays as well as by the Chinese and Indians. He flipped-flopped, making decisions and policies and reversing them, arresting opposition members under the ISA and then releasing them shortly after, claiming that he wanted to protect them.
2. Extremists among the Chinese and Indians felt they could safely challenge the Government, particularly over racial issues. They demanded that provisions in the Constitution favouring the Malays and the NEP quotas be removed. Even Barisan Nasional partners took up the call.
3. Normally UMNO leaders and UMNO generally would take up the defence of the Malays. But Abdullah as UMNO President and PM was silent (elegant silence) causing the other leaders and members of UMNO to become silent also.
4. As the attack against the Malays escalated and UMNO remained silent, the Malay public felt they were being let down by UMNO. Losing faith in UMNO, they began to set up NGOs to take up the challenges by the Chinese and Indian activists.
5. Perkasa as an NGO gained the most support because the founder was more vocal and willing to take risk and to rebut the views of the Chinese and Indian extremists.
6. Meanwhile Malay support for UMNO was silently eroding. In the 2008 elections the loss of Malay support for UMNO became evident. Many either abstained or voted for PAS.
7. Demands were then made for Abdullah to step down. Najib took over and he tried to regain Chinese support by apparently giving in to Chinese demands on several issues. The new UMNO leadership also opted to remain silent and failed to defend the Malay position. Instead of going back to support UMNO, Malays including UMNO members continue to flocked to Perkasa.
8. In the 2008 elections, many UMNO and BN candidates won only by small margins even in their strongholds. If in the next election defections by even a small number of supporters in some constituencies can result in a reduction of the Barisan Nasional majority or even cause the BN to lose altogether.
9. Because of the poor handling of the Perak crisis, the Chinese who considered the Pakatan Government of Perak as a Chinese Government, swore not to support BN anymore.
10. The situation of UMNO and BN looked bleak. They have not regained the Malay support lost in the 2008 elections and they face the prospect of the Chinese not supporting the Barisan Nasional in the 13th General Elections. Striving to regain Chinese support is not enough. They must also regain Malay support.
11. UMNO may think that all the Malays are supportive of the party. But UMNO cannot be sure of that. Their silence before the 2008 Election was deceptive. We now know that many supported the opposition. Can UMNO disregard or antagonise any Malay group? I think it would be dangerous to do so.
12. Perkasa has not indicated that it is against BN and UMNO. In fact it has hinted that it is for UMNO. Looking at the strength of Malay support for Perkasa antagonising them would not be to the benefit of the Barisan Nasional or UMNO.
13. Perkasa is accused of being racist and should be rejected on that ground. Is Perkasa racist? If anyone cares to study the statement by Perkasa he will not fail to note that it has confined itself to rebutting allegations that the non-Malays have been discriminated against, that the Malays need to retain their present position. If it is really racist then it would be demanding the abolition of the special treatment of the Chinese and Indians in Malaysia. This it has not done except when defending the Malay position.
14. It is illogical to expect that when the Chinese and Indian activists demand for the removal of policies and schemes to help the Malays, they, the Malays should remain silent or to agree. Surely the natural thing for them to do is to defend themselves. If their anointed protector, UMNO, refuses for whatever reason to voice disagreement against the demands of the Chinese and Indians, then the beleaguered Malays will have to find a champion elsewhere.
15. They could form a political party and undermine UMNO. But they did not. The Malays are already fragmented. And so they formed NGOs instead which leaves them with the option to support or not to support UMNO and the Barisan Nasional.
16. True there are a few Malays in Pakatan who seem to agree and support demands to do away with the affirmative action in favour of the Malays. But they are doing this simply to fish for Chinese support for their parties.
17. Whatever may be the feelings of UMNO, I have decided that the NGOs have a big enough following which could do damage to UMNO and the BN in the next election if they want to. Accordingly I have decided to stay close with Perkasa especially and to ensure that it does not swing over to the opposition. I would like to ensure that Perkasa supports the Barisan Nasional in the next election.
18. Does this make me a racist? I had at one time the opportunity and power to be a real Malay racist. But I won elections with strong non-Malay support. In fact in1999 it was Chinese support which gave me my 2/3 majority.
19. I was obviously not regarded as a racist then (except of course by the DAP). So why am I regarded as a racist now when all I want to do is to ensure Malay support for Barisan Nasional parties, especially UMNO.
2. Extremists among the Chinese and Indians felt they could safely challenge the Government, particularly over racial issues. They demanded that provisions in the Constitution favouring the Malays and the NEP quotas be removed. Even Barisan Nasional partners took up the call.
3. Normally UMNO leaders and UMNO generally would take up the defence of the Malays. But Abdullah as UMNO President and PM was silent (elegant silence) causing the other leaders and members of UMNO to become silent also.
4. As the attack against the Malays escalated and UMNO remained silent, the Malay public felt they were being let down by UMNO. Losing faith in UMNO, they began to set up NGOs to take up the challenges by the Chinese and Indian activists.
5. Perkasa as an NGO gained the most support because the founder was more vocal and willing to take risk and to rebut the views of the Chinese and Indian extremists.
6. Meanwhile Malay support for UMNO was silently eroding. In the 2008 elections the loss of Malay support for UMNO became evident. Many either abstained or voted for PAS.
7. Demands were then made for Abdullah to step down. Najib took over and he tried to regain Chinese support by apparently giving in to Chinese demands on several issues. The new UMNO leadership also opted to remain silent and failed to defend the Malay position. Instead of going back to support UMNO, Malays including UMNO members continue to flocked to Perkasa.
8. In the 2008 elections, many UMNO and BN candidates won only by small margins even in their strongholds. If in the next election defections by even a small number of supporters in some constituencies can result in a reduction of the Barisan Nasional majority or even cause the BN to lose altogether.
9. Because of the poor handling of the Perak crisis, the Chinese who considered the Pakatan Government of Perak as a Chinese Government, swore not to support BN anymore.
10. The situation of UMNO and BN looked bleak. They have not regained the Malay support lost in the 2008 elections and they face the prospect of the Chinese not supporting the Barisan Nasional in the 13th General Elections. Striving to regain Chinese support is not enough. They must also regain Malay support.
11. UMNO may think that all the Malays are supportive of the party. But UMNO cannot be sure of that. Their silence before the 2008 Election was deceptive. We now know that many supported the opposition. Can UMNO disregard or antagonise any Malay group? I think it would be dangerous to do so.
12. Perkasa has not indicated that it is against BN and UMNO. In fact it has hinted that it is for UMNO. Looking at the strength of Malay support for Perkasa antagonising them would not be to the benefit of the Barisan Nasional or UMNO.
13. Perkasa is accused of being racist and should be rejected on that ground. Is Perkasa racist? If anyone cares to study the statement by Perkasa he will not fail to note that it has confined itself to rebutting allegations that the non-Malays have been discriminated against, that the Malays need to retain their present position. If it is really racist then it would be demanding the abolition of the special treatment of the Chinese and Indians in Malaysia. This it has not done except when defending the Malay position.
14. It is illogical to expect that when the Chinese and Indian activists demand for the removal of policies and schemes to help the Malays, they, the Malays should remain silent or to agree. Surely the natural thing for them to do is to defend themselves. If their anointed protector, UMNO, refuses for whatever reason to voice disagreement against the demands of the Chinese and Indians, then the beleaguered Malays will have to find a champion elsewhere.
15. They could form a political party and undermine UMNO. But they did not. The Malays are already fragmented. And so they formed NGOs instead which leaves them with the option to support or not to support UMNO and the Barisan Nasional.
16. True there are a few Malays in Pakatan who seem to agree and support demands to do away with the affirmative action in favour of the Malays. But they are doing this simply to fish for Chinese support for their parties.
17. Whatever may be the feelings of UMNO, I have decided that the NGOs have a big enough following which could do damage to UMNO and the BN in the next election if they want to. Accordingly I have decided to stay close with Perkasa especially and to ensure that it does not swing over to the opposition. I would like to ensure that Perkasa supports the Barisan Nasional in the next election.
18. Does this make me a racist? I had at one time the opportunity and power to be a real Malay racist. But I won elections with strong non-Malay support. In fact in1999 it was Chinese support which gave me my 2/3 majority.
19. I was obviously not regarded as a racist then (except of course by the DAP). So why am I regarded as a racist now when all I want to do is to ensure Malay support for Barisan Nasional parties, especially UMNO.
Penghuni Gua : Hidup PERKASA. Teruskan perjuangan untuk Bangsa Melayu. Jangan mengganggu hak orang lain. Kita perjuangkan hak kita sahaja.
2. Kepada UMNO, ingat ! Kuasa anda sekarang adalah datangnya dari undi Melayu. Bukan dari undi orang / bangsa lain. Jadi dekati Melayu yang begitu setia selama ini. Cara dekati Melayu, salah satunya ialah melalui PERKASA. Jangan memusuhi PERKASA.
3. UMNO jangan jadi bodoh seperti beberapa kerat pemimpinnya yang menjauhi diri dari PERKASA / Melayu. Sampaikan salam PG kepada Ku Nan , Nazri dan KJ. Kepada anda bertiga, jangan hipokritlah. Anda bertiga dah tak releven kepada Melayu. Jom kita sama-sama singkirkan mereka bertiga dalam PRU 13. Tengok apa yang 3 makhluk ini rasakan nanti kerana ketepikan suara melayu.
4. Hidup PERKASA. Hidup TUN Mahathir. Semuga Tun terus dirahmati dan dilindungi Allah senantiasa.
(Kenyataan Tun Dr. Mahathir kepada wartawan pada 3hb Mac 1994 di Nilam Puri, Kelantan Darul Naim): Hukum rejam kepada penzina adalah primitif
ReplyDelete(Ucapan Tun Dr. Mahathir pada 14 Ogos 1994 di Pasir Mas Kelantan). Sukar dilaksanakan hukum syarak kerana masyarakat Malaysia bukan seratus peratus Islam.
(Ucapan Tun Dr. Mahathir pada 3 Mac 1994 di Pusat Bahasa Arab, Nilam Puri, Kelantan). Apakah hukum hudud mesti dilaksanakan juga walau apa pun keadaan sehingga mendatangkan mudarat kepada orang Islam. Apakah dalam keadaan Islam sudah lemah, hukum2 yang boleh melemahkan lagi orang Islam mesti dilaksanakan? – Ucapan Tun Dr. Mahathir pada 3 Mac 1994 di Pusat Bahasa Arab, Nilam Puri, Kelantan)
(Ucapan Tun Dr. Mahathir pada 3 Mac di Pusat Bahasa Arab, Nilam Puri, Kelantan) Hudud tidak boleh dilaksanakan kerana sukar mendapat saksi yang tidak fasik. -
(Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, temubualnya dengan media massa, 14 Julai 1992) “Apabila hukum rejam batu sampai mati kepada penzina dan potong tangan kepada pencuri, nescaya ramailah rakyat Islam yang mati dan kudung tangan.Ini sangat memalukan ummat Islam, kerana orang bukan Islam akan sempurna sifatnya dan boleh meneruskan kerja.”
(Sulaiman Daud, temubualnya dengan media massa, 20 Ogos 1993)” Pada pendapat saya, undang-undang Islam tidak sesuai dilaksanakan di Malaysia sekarang. Lebih baiklah undang-undang yang ada dikekalkan
( bersambung )
( sambungan )
ReplyDelete(Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, ucapannya di Pasir Mas, 14 Ogos 1994). “Al-Quran perlu ditafsirkan semula untuk disesuaikan dengan keadaan masa kini.”
(Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, temubualnya dengan media massa selepas sidang Majlis Tertinggi UMNO, 1994). “Saya akan mempastikan bahawa negeri-negeri yang diperintah oleh Barisan Nasional tidak akan melaksanakan hukum hudud.”
(Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, ucapannya di Pasir Mas, Kelantan, 14 Ogos 1994). “Kerja yang paling sesuai bagi Tok Guru (ulama’) ialah mengajar, bukan mentadbir.”
.(Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, ucapannya di Pasir Mas, Kelantan, 14 Ogos 1994). “Sukar dilaksanakan hukum syarak kerana masyarakat Malaysia bukan seratus peratus Islam”.
(Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, ucapannya di Pasir Mas, Kelantan, 14 Ogos 1994). “Kita (Kerajaan Pusat) akan ambil tindakan jika Kelantan meneruskan usaha melaksanakan hudud.”
(Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, kenyataannya kepada wartawan, 30 April 1992). “Bukan kerana dengan melaksanakan hukum hudud saja kita boleh menjadi Islam. Kita tengok banyak negara Islam yang tidak melaksanakan hukum hudud,tetapi tidak bermakna mereka tidak Islam.”
(Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, temubualnya dengan wartawan, 18 Ogos 1991. “Perlaksanaaan hukum hudud boleh menyebabkan umat Islam menjadi mundur kerana tidak boleh bersaing dengan orang bukan Islam apabila orang Islam dipotong tangannya dan dilakukan hukum hudud yang lain, sedangkan orang bukan Islam tidak dikenakan.”
(Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, bercakap kepada wartawan, 24 April 1992) . “Jika mereka hendakkan sangat hukum hudud, mereka kenalah cuba hukum mereka sendiri atau mahkamah mereka sendiri. Mereka seronok nak potong tangan orang, seolah-olah jika tidak potong tangan, tidak Islam. Sekarang kita nak tengoklah mereka boleh buat atau tidak.”
(Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, bercakap kepada wartawan, 20 April 1992): “Kerajaan Kelantan harus dipertanggungjawab jika berlaku huru hara, ketidakstabilan politik, perpecahan di kalangan umat Islam dan kegelisahan
rakyat apabila hukum hudud dilaksanakan di negeri itu.rakyat harus menyoal perlaksaaan hukum itu menguntungkan atau menyebabkan perpecahan pertentangan dan ketidakstabilan politik. Tidak semua negara Islam mengamalkan hukum hudud, bahkan ada negara Islam lebih makmur tanpa hukum itu.”
(Dr. Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, ucapannya di Papar, Sabah, 2 Mei 1992). “Bagaimana kita boleh maju kalau orang Islam sudah tidak ada tangan dan kaki? Bagaimana mereka mahu bersaing dengan bangsa-bangsa lain, kalau sifatnya sudah tidak cukup? Hukum hudud tidak sesuai dilaksanakan di negara ini yang mempunyai rakyat berbilang kaum dan agama
( Bersambung )
( sambungan )
ReplyDelete(Datuk Dr. Yusuf Nor, temubualnya dengan Radio Tiga Ibu Kota, 6 Mac 1994) “Sebarang undang-undang yang dilaksanakan di Malaysia sekarang yang selaras dengan undang-undang Islam boleh dianggap sebagai undang-undang Islam.”
(Dr. Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, ucapannya di Pasir Mas, Kelantan, 14 Ogos 1994). “Melaksanakan hukum hudud sehingga melemahkan orang Islam sehingga menjadi masyarakat kucar kacir dan ditindas oleh orang lain tidaklah secucuk dengan ajaran Islam.”
(Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad 2/5/92) ‘Bagaimana kita boleh maju kalau orang Islam rakyat Islam yang mati dan kudung sudah tiada tangan dan
kaki. Bagaimana mereka mahu bersaing dengan bangsa-bangsa lain kalau sifatnya sudah tidak cukup. Hukum Hudud tidak sesuai dilaksanakan di negara ini yang mempunyai rakyat berbilang kaum dan agama’.
(Dato’ Seri Najib Tun Abd Razak 20/4/93) ‘Negara akan huru-hara sekiranya undang-undang Islam dilaksanakan’.
(Dato’ Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi: 13/11/99) ‘Apa erti negara Islam jika mundur’ pada 20hb April 1983 kepada para wartawan): Negara akan huru-hara sekiranya undang2 Islam dilaksanakan - pada 30 April 1992 di perjumpaan Ketua2 UMNO bahagian Johor). Saya nak tahu siapakan di antara ahli2 Pas yang sanggup memotong tangan orang jika hudud dilaksanakan di Kelantan. Barangkali Nik Aziz akan melakukannya. Jika benar kita nak tengok apa yang berlaku selepas hukum itu nanti..
HE HE HE.....
PATUT PON LIM KIT SIANG HABAQ UMNO KAPIAQ
Kesian Lord Ried.
ReplyDeleteSayang sungguh dia dgn DAP.
Cintanya terhadap DAP umpama kasihnya kepada ibubapa.
Segala usaha DAP disokong 100% oleh Lord Ried.
Kesian..
Kesian... Lord Ried.
Dosa seseorang Islam pasti diampun oleh Allah bila bertaubat Nasuha.
Lord reid boleh lak caya kat LiM Kit Sial....Ini tentu lord reid hidung kembang cam babi tu...keh keh keh..
ReplyDeleteLord reid = Lim Kit Sial= kafir
to : lord ried
ReplyDelete1.berkawan dengan syaitan boleh (N.ajis)
2.HALAL darah Islam UMNO (N.ajis)
3.Syahid klu mati lwn Islam UMNO (N.ajis)
4.Mengangkat kafir harbi komunis jadi "khalifah Umar Abdul Aziz" penang (N.ajis)
5.UMNO kafir (N.ajis)
6.semua yang hamPAS buat betul dan jihad (walaupun fitnah) (N.ajis)
7.semua yang UMNO buat salah dan haram (tapi ambil,makan,pakai,guna tak haram (N.ajis)
he..he..hamPAS..hamPAS..dah terkena ilmu pukau N.ajis..he..he..
ALJUBURI
ReplyDeleteLot Burit memang la caya ngn LKS dari segala-galanya, sebab mak bapak dia da didik dia cmtu, orang melayu islam musoh nyata utk Lot Burit, cina kapir lebih2 lagi cina DAP harus di pertahankan hingga ke titisan darah terakhir, antara pesanan bapak Lot Burit sebelom mampos.
ELO BEWAK2 MELAYU YANG MENTEDARAH TAIK......
ReplyDeleteKALU LIM KIT SIANG NAMPAK HAMPA KAPIAQ, TAK TAU LA....BEZA NYA HAMPA TAK KEDARAH BABI SAJA LA.
SEPATUTNYA HAMPA BULIH KEDARAH BABI KA, JUDI KA, MEIN POMPUAN KA, SABIK PARTI JAMBAN TADAK PANTANG LARANG NOOOOOOO.....HA HA HA HA
he he he
gurau ngan puak2 bewak
To lord ried, i can't resist myself not reading when seeing 'lord ried said.....hahaha..sorry ye.Lawak2 je dgn lord reid
ReplyDeleteAku ada sikit profil tentang Lord Reid Pukimak ni, dia ni asal dari permatang Pauh tempat ejen CIA main bontot, dia ni dah dilarang dilaman pembangkang sebab banyak guna perkataan lucah. Sekarang dia cuba nak provok laman penyokong kerajaan, dia juga guru disekolah kebangsaan dekat Permatang Pauh mengajar murid Tahun dua sebab dia lulusan sijil Perguruan saja, Bini dia tengah kursus buat KPLI di UPSI, aku pernah maki dia sampai pagi di laman pembangkang pinkturtle. Oleh itu dia ni diibaratka dajal jugalah, jika dia masuk maki saja dia,jangan layan sangat si lahabau
ReplyDeleteKah kah kah kah kah kah
Salam tuan PG & Sema2...'
ReplyDeletePERKASA AND ME : TUN MAHATHIR !!!!!1
Ambo sian sngoti ko mugo seko tuh, patulah demo oyat bewok jelir2 pong..., nyo kecek sore2, pahtuh ore kato gapo nih syok sdirilah tuh...!!!. Kalu nok oyat jenis hok baso curi reto ore nih, jom pakat ko patai timor, xdok kroni pong. Kito buke tok taung, puok2 ostat wolly triumphah pakat acah2 jah ngn udud hampas tuh, sbbnyo kalu ccuri balok xdok dalam udud nok kerat tange pong.
Pang5 Beliung sampai bila2 tabek Tun Dr M, hanya Tun lah seseorang pemimpin Islam yang boleh dihormati berbanding dengan pemimpin Isle yang mendakwa menegak hukum Allah.., konononnya.
fatwa pok nik :
ReplyDeleterasuah dikatakan zakat, rasuah dikatakan duit tambang, rasuah dikatakan sponsor haji, doa bala sesasma islam boleh. berkawan dengan syaitan boleh, mencarut boleh sebab Allah pun mencarut. doa pecah perut pada ds najib
apa cerita lord reid. cakap bolehlah.
curi balak orang kafir / tahiland halal ( 1990 ) di tanah merah. hidup lagi mp tu sekarang. kopiah dan serban sebesar bakul. itu yang 12 orang pegawai hutan kelantan diculik oleh navik thailand 1990. dengan pengarah hutan kelantan diculiknya. tanyalah dato jamaluddin pangarah hutan kelantann masa itu. ada tak fatwa sebegini.
kah kah kah kah
betul tu pang5 beliung. benar sekali. lr siapa ye?
ReplyDeletekah kah kah
Salam tuan PG & Sema2...,
ReplyDeletePERKASA AND ME : TUN MAHATHIR !!!!!1
Terima kasih tuan PG nama pun Ariff adalah yang lebih arif...!!!
Pang5 Beliung